Art and design

Books

Culture

Environment

Fashion

Film

Life and style

Money

Music

Politics

Science

Technology

Travel

Television

US news

World news

Lawsuit claims border patrol violated constitution by searching Delta plane

In the suit, Amadei and eight other plaintiffs claim two uniformed CBP officers ‘positioned themselves in the doorway of the airplane, forcing passengers to queue inside and delaying their exit’.
In the suit, Kelley Amadei and eight other plaintiffs claim two uniformed CBP officers ‘positioned themselves in the doorway of the airplane, forcing passengers to queue inside and delaying their exit’. Photograph: David Goldman/AP

The Department of Homeland Security is facing a class action lawsuit over an incident in which all the passengers on a domestic flight were held and searched by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents before being allowed to get off their plane – potentially in violation of the US constitution.

The action, filed in New York, is part of an ACLU-backed effort to force the department and its subsidiary agencies, CBP and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), to clarify their position on an unusual and potentially unconstitutional inspection procedure it described as “routine” in press reports at the time.

The suit claims that after Delta flight 1583 from San Francisco landed at New York’s JFK on 22 February, passengers had their identity documents seized and searched, a violation of constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure under the fourth amendment.

“The officers did not have any legal justification for seizing and searching these passengers,” said the ACLU’s deputy legal director, Cecillia Wang.

“This is a serious and illegal erosion of our basic civil liberties. Because CBP publicly took the position that this action was pursuant to policy and a ‘routine’ matter, we are compelled to take action to ensure that this doesn’t happen to passengers on future flights.”

The lead plaintiff in the case, Kelley Amadei, who was on the flight with her seven-year-old son, told the Guardian that CBP’s demand had made her feel “intimidated and confused as to why they would be asking for our IDs at the end of a flight. I felt like they weren’t looking for any one person because they were checking everyone. I felt violated.”

The CBP said that its agents, acting on an Ice request, asked to see passengers’ identification as they searched for an immigrant who had received a deportation order after multiple criminal convictions for domestic assault, driving while impaired and violating a protective order.

“An individual with a final order of removal from a federal immigration judge was scheduled to be on a flight from San Francisco to JFK on the evening of 22 February, in furtherance of the removal process,” Ice said in a statement provided to the Washington Post. “It was later determined that the individual was not placed on the flight in San Francisco.”

In the suit, Amadei and eight other plaintiffs claim two uniformed CBP officers “positioned themselves in the doorway of the airplane, forcing passengers to queue inside and delaying their exit”.

The officers, the suit alleges, “made it clear, through their own conduct and by directing pre-arrival announcements by the flight crew, that compliance was not voluntary and that passengers would not be permitted to disembark until they showed their identification documents”.

The plaintiffs further claim the officers did not have a warrant permitting search or seizure of the passengers or probable cause to believe that anyone on the plane had committed a crime.

Amadei says she went to ask the officers why the passengers had been detained, and was told “you have nothing to worry about, leave it alone”.

“It felt like an unwarranted search and request for identification in a situation that did not call for it. When no explanation was given the feeling that our fourth amendment rights had been violated were amplified.”

“It was a show of force. I’ve been nervous that it could happen again, or that I might be detained for no reason. It’s given more of a sense of awareness, a sense of living in a police state.”

Amadei also says she does not accept the official explanation for the search. “If they were looking for an individual who was known, why were they checking every single person on the flight, male, female, regardless of age and regardless of race.”

Her son, she says, was also shaken by the experience. In the court papers, she states: “My son was so scared that he asked if our family was in trouble and whether everything was OK.”

The suit seeks a permanent injunction barring the government from seizing and conducting warrantless and/or suspicionless identification checks of passengers disembarking from domestic flights.

“We feel compelled to bring this suit because CBP said the search was consistent with agency policy,” says the ACLU’s Wang. The civil rights body sent a letter expressing concern over the CBP action in September and asking the agency to confirm under what authority it had acted.

“They did not respond so we feel we need to bring the suit in order to get a court order that clarifies the fourth amendment does not permit the CBP to apprehend every passenger on a domestic flight.”

The fourth amendment to the US constitution, adopted in 1792, reads: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

This article titled "Lawsuit claims border patrol violated constitution by searching Delta plane" was written by Edward Helmore in New York, for theguardian.com on Thursday 12 October 2017 07.53pm

US news

US shutdown: White House phone message blames Democrats

Members of the public phoning the White House during the US government shutdown are being played a… Read more

Seldom seen, rarely heard: Melania's tenure is most notable for her absence

The most notable thing about Melania Trump’s tenure as first lady so far has been her absence: it… Read more

Government shutdown: Republicans float minor immigration deal to end 'Dreamers' deadlock

The US government shutdown edged closer to a resolution on Sunday night after a minor concession… Read more

US government shutdown: anniversary of Trump inauguration marred by chaos

Donald Trump’s first anniversary in office was marked by the turbulence and division that have… Read more

Republican axed from ethics body after report on alleged sexual misconduct

A Republican congressman on Saturday denied an allegation of sexual misconduct made in a report… Read more

Failed deal over Dreamers at the heart of US government shutdown

As the clock wound toward a shutdown of the federal government on Friday night, a group of young… Read more

Women's marches protest Donald Trump on anniversary of inauguration – as it happened

We’re going to close our rolling coverage of the second Women’s March protests and the government… Read more

Government shutdown: Trump attacks Democrats and calls for 'nuclear option'

As the second day of the US government shutdown wore on, there appeared little sign of progress. As… Read more

One year later, thousands return for Women's March with spirits undaunted

A year after millions of women and men demonstrated in cities around the globe in an extraordinary… Read more

Raw deal: sushi-loving California man discovers 5ft 6in tapeworm

A California man’s daily sushi habit ended in a trip to hospital with a stomach-churning item to… Read more